Planning & Scheduling Excellence Guide (PASEG)

Using Schedule Margin to Increase the Accuracy of Forecast Completion Dates

, , ,
Header Image with geometric background that says Schedule Margin - Increase the Accuracy of Forecast Completion Dates

As part of our project scheduling workshops, hands-on Oracle Primavera P6 or Microsoft Project (MSP) workshops, or scheduling support assignments, we often assist clients with establishing their scheduling best practices. One of the techniques we cover in our EVM training workshops or help incorporate into our client’s scheduling process and procedures is the use of schedule margin as a means to handle schedule risks on a project. The proper use of schedule margin as well as making it a part of a project’s risk and opportunity management process can help to increase the accuracy of an integrated master schedule (IMS) to forecast milestone or project completion dates. 

What is Schedule Margin?

The NDIA Planning and Scheduling Excellence Guide (PASEG) Version 4.0 dated August 2019, defines schedule margin as “an optional technique used for insight and management of schedule risks.” Schedule margin is a period of time that is identified in the project’s plan for risk mitigation where an internal target date is set prior to a commitment date such a major project milestone or deliverable. Schedule margin is a defined task in the integrated master schedule (IMS) with logic ties (the immediate predecessor task) to a project finish milestone or intermediate decision point/milestone.

The placement and duration of the schedule margin task is based on a risk management assessment that may include a probabilistic three-point Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA). It may also be driven by schedule incentives, stakeholders needs, subcontractor interfaces, customer provided inputs, tightening of range estimates to single point estimates, or other influences.  

Some have described schedule margin as management reserve for time. A simple example would be scheduling your drive to work. Should you easily get through the traffic lights and there are no issues, you can usually make it in 30 minutes. However, because of the “risks” associated with hitting more red lights and other issues, coupled with the penalty of being late, you might plan for the trip to take 45 minutes. Those additional 15 minutes are your schedule margin.

Note however, schedule margin is not a space filler to hide positive float, a schedule stash to cover slippage, or a method used to hold an event’s date. It is a way to incorporate risk into the schedule and improve the forecast accuracy. Some government customers have refined the definition and usage of schedule margin which can impact how you incorporate schedule margin in a given project’s IMS. We will address a couple of specific government customer requirements below.

Applying the Schedule Margin Technique

The customer and contractor project manager both have a vested interest in establishing and using schedule margin. During the development of the project’s requirements definition and planning, the customer will establish need dates. Based on these need dates, target dates for key decision points/milestones are established based on an assessment of risks and constraints. Depending on the complexity, life cycle phase, and risk, the targets may be stated as a single date or range of dates. These targets are provided in the request for proposal or as guidance to the internal project team. The contractor creates a plan and estimate based on their proposal process that includes a risk management assessment. The risks that impact the ability to achieve the target dates are included in the assessment and schedule margin tasks are identified as needed.

Upon award, the contractor creates a baseline IMS with defined schedule margin tasks. These schedule margin tasks are identified as schedule visibility tasks (SVTs) within the IMS. These SVTs are usually placed immediately prior to the decision point/milestone or project finish milestone. The schedule margin SVTs do not have associated resources, they represent a time reserve. Each SVT should be clearly labeled as Schedule Margin and defined. There should be linkage and traceability between the schedule margin SVTs and the risk management plan. The customer may also identify additional schedule margin beyond the contractor’s project target dates to reflect risk to the customer need dates.

As work progresses on the project, the assessment of risks and impact to schedule margin are evaluated. Performance is measured against the baseline targets and forecasts are provided. The risk management plan is also assessed, and mitigations adjusted as needed. These assessments provide input into determining whether the schedule margin requires an updated forecast. Any changes or consumption of the schedule margin should be documented and communicated.

Specific Contracting Requirements

Know your customer’s requirements! Customers may have specific requirements related to the creation, management, and reporting of the IMS. Within the IMS requirements, the customer may have included specific guidance for the use of schedule margin. Be sure you have considered all contract clauses, data item descriptions, and statement of work requirements when planning the project. Views into the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Energy (DOE) schedule margin requirements are provided below. Note: we are focusing on schedule margin for this discussion and purposely avoiding other IMS related topics.

Use of Schedule Margin on DoD Contracts

Schedule margin is an optional technique used for insight and management of schedule risks. It is represented by a task or tasks within the IMS with no assigned resources and is established as part of the baseline. In a DoD contractual environment, schedule margin:

  • Resides in both the baseline and forecast schedules.
  • Should be under the control of the contractor’s project manager.
  • Is only placed as the last task before key contractual events, significant logical integration/test milestones, end item deliverables, or contract completion.
  • Is associated with schedule risk as part of a formal risk management plan.

The duration of the schedule margin task should be based on risk in subsequent events and traceable to the risk management plan. Schedule margin may be directly or indirectly connected to discrete predecessor and successor activities and fall on critical paths. All schedule margin tasks should be clearly and consistently identifiable. Schedule margin tasks should be excluded (zero duration) when performing a Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA).

Significant changes to the status of schedule margin tasks and impacts to the project’s primary critical path, if any, should be discussed in the Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) Format 5 or the Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis (IPMDAR) Performance Narrative Report.

Figure 1 is a conceptual diagram of applying a schedule margin task before the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) milestone.

Example of a Schedule Margin Task Before a Major Milestone
Figure 1: Example of a Schedule Margin Task Before a Major Milestone

Use of Schedule Margin on DOE Contracts

The DOE has provided more specific definitions for schedule margin. They have also defined the use of DOE owned schedule contingency to buffer the schedule against unforeseen events that could cause a delay. This is documented in the DOE Guide 413.3-24 for Planning and Scheduling.

The contractor is responsible for managing their schedule margin. It resides as a single task just prior to the contractor’s project completion milestone. The DOE program office is responsible for managing schedule contingency. Schedule contingency resides after the contractor’s project completion milestone and just prior to the Critical Decision (CD) 4 milestone (Approve Start of Operations or Project Completion).

The contractor’s schedule margin and the DOE schedule contingency are both established in conjunction with CD-2 (Approve Performance Baseline), but updates may occur in conjunction with changes. The schedule margin is set commensurate with the schedule risk calculated at a probability level typically between 70 and 90 percent. The SRA accounts for risk events assigned to the contractor and contractor activity duration uncertainty. Activity duration uncertainty is determined either through a three-point duration estimate or by confidence level (high, medium, or low).

Similar to schedule margin, the DOE owned schedule contingency is set commensurate with the schedule risk calculated at a probability level typically between 70 and 90 percent. This SRA accounts for risk events assigned to DOE and DOE activity duration uncertainty.

The IMS may depict these activities as SVTs. Figure 2 is a conceptual diagram that shows the application of the schedule margin task before the contractor’s completion milestone and the DOE schedule contingency before the project finish milestone.

Example of a Schedule Margin Task and DOE Schedule Contingency Task
Figure 2: Example of a Schedule Margin Task and DOE Schedule Contingency Task

Interested in incorporating the schedule margin technique into your scheduling best practices? Call us today at (714) 685-1730. We have experienced master schedulers familiar with a variety of scheduling tools that can help you incorporate industry best practices into your scheduling process and procedures. They also well versed in applying schedule risk analysis techniques that complements incorporating schedule margin tasks into an IMS.

Using Schedule Margin to Increase the Accuracy of Forecast Completion Dates Read Post »

Video Release – Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 2 of 2

, , , , , , , , , , ,

The conclusion of our review of the foundational elements of performing a schedule risk assessment (SRA) using Acumen Risk 6.1

0:17 – Risk Exposure Chart
1:03 – Tornado Chart
2:14 – Parting Thoughts

Read the blog post at:

Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 2 of 2

Video Release – Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 2 of 2 Read Post »

Video Release – Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 1 of 2

, , , , , , , , , , ,

 

How confident are you that your project will finish on time? Review the foundational elements of performing a schedule risk assessment (SRA) using Acumen Risk 6.1

2:22 – Schedule Health Diagnostics
4:55 – Duration Uncertainty
6:35 – Risk Events
8:20 – Simulation Process
 
Read the blog post at:

Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 1 of 2

Video Release – Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 1 of 2 Read Post »

Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 1 of 2

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Perform Schedule Risk Assessments? EVMS and Agile implementations within the same company or on the same project.

Before a project is ready to be baselined, a typical question the customer asks the project manager is, “How confident are you that the project will finish on time?”

This is a more difficult question than you might think.  In competitive environments, guessing is not an option.  The probability of success on a project must be quantified.  The risks that impact the odds for success must also be quantified.  If the risk is managed, the probability of completing the project on time and under budget is improved.

Customers are not blind to the importance of risk management.  This is evidenced by recent changes in government contracting requirements that call for formal risk assessments of project schedules.  Even if risk management were not a contractual requirement, it would be irresponsible for any project manager to ignore the need for risk management and proceed without identifying and assessing the project’s risks.

Schedule risk exists in every project.  This risk can be quantified, analyzed, and mitigated, or it can be ignored.  However, ignoring schedule risk does not make it go away.  Fortunately, there are advanced software tools, such as Deltek’s Acumen Risk, that can help model the expected impacts of risk in the schedule. Then, the answer to “how confident are you that the project will finish on time?” can be answered with quantifiable information.

In the following sections, a few of the foundational elements of performing a schedule risk assessment (SRA) using Acumen Risk 6.1 will be discussed.  The software was designed with the understanding that not everyone is an expert in schedule risk analysis.  The software provides beginners with an easy to follow path to perform in-depth schedule risk analysis as well as advanced features for experienced risk experts.

Along with quick start guides and help documentation, the menu structure is laid out like a schedule maturity timeline.  From left to right, the menu selections take one from the start-up steps of importing the schedule, to analyzing the schedule, assessing schedule risk, accelerating the schedule, and advanced customization features.

Deltek_Acumen-Top-Level_MenusDeltek Acumen – Top-Level Menus

 

Schedule Health Diagnostics

Before delving into schedule risk assessments, let’s take one minor detour from risk into schedule diagnostics.

Would you trust a broken watch to tell you the correct time?  The same goes for a schedule risk assessment.  A broken schedule network cannot be trusted to yield reliable, and therefore actionable, SRA results.

The National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Integrated Program Management Division (IPMD) Planning & Scheduling Excellence Guide (PASEG), is widely regarded as one of the premier references on scheduling best practices.  The PASEG was created by a joint team of both government and industry scheduling experts, thus it has no particular point of view to promote or defend.  One of the scheduling best practices the PASEG discusses is that the integrated master schedule (IMS) should be validated before any SRA is performed.  “Validated” means that the tasks, logic, durations, constraints, and lags in the IMS should be analyzed and corrected as necessary.

Acumen Fuse provides a complete set of schedule diagnostics.  When I first clicked on the “Diagnostics” tab, I saw an initial set of metrics.

EVMS: Acumen Fuse Schedule diagnostics

Each one of these metrics was applied to the project’s timeline that which makes it easy to see both where and when the issues occur.  What I did not notice at first was that these metrics were just one subset; I was only looking at the “Schedule Quality” subset of the diagnostics.  There were similar subsets in the areas of Logic, Duration, Constraints, Float, and the DCMA 14-point Schedule Assessment, just to name a few.  All of these diagnostic tests can be modified to reflect your company or customer’s standards.

Before leaving the topic of schedule health, there are a few words of caution.  No matter how useful a schedule analysis tool may be, there is no substitute for the task managers taking ownership of the IMS and ensuring that it is in good working order.  For example, analysis software can be used to check to determine if a task has a predecessor and a successor, but only someone familiar with the effort can determine if a task has the “correct” predecessor and successor.  Analysis software is becoming more and more sophisticated, but people still control the success or failure of the project.

Duration Uncertainty

Once a sound schedule has been developed, the next foundational elements of an SRA are the duration uncertainty estimates.  There are two widely accepted methods of assigning duration uncertainty.

The preferred and more precise method is to obtain three-point duration estimates (best case, worst case, and most likely) from the task owners.  At a minimum, this should be performed on all critical and near-critical tasks (and driving and near-driving tasks supporting significant events).  For larger schedule networks, it may not be reasonable to gather this type of information for every task.  If custom three-point estimates are not available, templated duration uncertainty could be applied based on the type of work, the task owner, historical performance, or any other applicable task characteristic.

Acumen Risk handles both methods very easily.  Custom three-point estimates can be entered for each task in days (or hours), or as a percentage of the current remaining duration of the task.  Standard duration uncertainty templates are easily applied to a task by selecting the appropriate risk level on the calibration bar.  To streamline the process, by setting the calibration at any summary level, the uncertainty template is cascaded down to all the “children” tasks.

Description. Calibration.

Risk Events

One thing traditional Critical Path Method (CPM) networks do poorly is model unexpected results.  For example, if there is a 90% success rate on fatigue testing, the IMS will generally be constructed to assume the test will be successful, with no disruption to downstream tasks.

EVMS: Critical Path Method

But what happens if the test fails?  While unlikely, there is still a very real possibility that the results will be unfavorable.  If the test does return unfavorable results, there will likely be a significant delay while re-work is performed in the areas of design, build and test.  A traditional CPM network can model a successful test or an unsuccessful test, but not both.  This is not a problem with a schedule risk assessment.  Information from the project’s risk register can be used to model the likelihood of a test failure, as well as the consequence, or delay to downstream tasks resulting from that failure.

EVMS: CPM Risk Events Consequence

Is this an acceptable risk?  An SRA can quantify the risk and provide information on the likelihood of successful deliveries.  Acumen does not stop there though.  One of its newest features is to organize and track all risk events within its built-in risk register, as well as to track the steps being taken to help mitigate that risk.  Or, if your organization already maintains an external risk register in Excel, it can be imported into Acumen to eliminate the duplicate tracking of risk events.  Whether the risk register is imported from Excel or built from scratch within Acumen, a single risk event can then be mapped to one or more activities, or a single activity can be associated with one or more risk events.

EVMS: risk registers 

 

Simulation ProcessEVMS: Simulation Process

A typical SRA uses Monte Carlo techniques to simulate hundreds or thousands of potential project outcomes using the risks and uncertainties that have been supplied.

For most users, simply accepting the default settings and pushing the “Run Risk Analysis” button would be sufficient.  But if terms like “Convergence”, “Correlation Coefficient”, “Central Limits Theorem” and “Seed Value” are part of your normal working environment, Acumen provides a variety of settings that can be customized to tune the SRA to best model your project.

No matter which approach you take, the Acumen toolset provides a quick and easy simulation process.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What to Expect in Part 2

Part 2 of this blog will delve into the interpretation of SRA results.

 

Yancy Qualls, PSP

Engagement Director, Schedule Subject Matter Expert (SME)

Humphreys & Associates, Inc.

Assessing Schedule Risk Using Deltek’s Acumen Risk 6.1 | Part 1 of 2 Read Post »

Scroll to Top