Integrated Program Management Division

Who Owns EVM? Programs or Finance?

, , , , , , , ,
earned value management: finance department or programsI have read several Earned Value Management (EVM) reports, papers, and articles that debate what company organization should “own” EVM and the company’s Earned Value Management System (EVMS). These debates most often mention the programs’ organization and the finance department as common EVM “owners.” The majority opinion seems to be that because EVM is a program management best practice it belongs in programs. A minority opinion is that because EVM is denominated in dollars, schedule included, and because EVM reports are financial in nature, EVM belongs in the finance department. Before we dive into this debate, a summary of the responsibilities of a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and of the head of programs is useful. In our company A and company B examples to follow, both the CFO and the head of programs report to the company president.

WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF A CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ( CFO)?

A CFO has three duties, each measured in the time domain. The first duty of the CFO is as the company’s controller and is responsible to accurately and honestly report past company financial performance. The CFO is also responsible for the current financial health of the company – to insure that today’s decisions create rather than destroy value. And lastly, the CFO must protect the company’s future financial health and that all expenditures of capital maximize future financial health. Every business decision, especially those of the CFO, are either good decisions (are accretive – increase shareowner value) or are bad decisions (are dilutive – destroys shareowner value).

WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE HEAD OF PROGRAMS?

The head of programs is typically a Vice President or higher and all program and project managers report to him or her. The head of all programs has profit and loss responsibility for his or her portfolio of programs and projects. In addition, each program is responsible for achieving the technical, cost and schedule requirements of the contracts it is executing on behalf of its customers.

A TALE OF TWO COMPANIES:

I will now describe first-hand experiences with two companies and how each company decided who should “own” EVM.

Company “A” had EVM assigned to the finance department. All EVM employees were overhead, even those assigned to a program. A new CFO arrived and quickly decided to reduce indirect costs, declaring that he was “coin-operated.” The new CFO terminated the employment of all EVM employees. Each program attempted to create an EVM branch office but failed. A level 3 CAR enumerating EVM deficiencies was issued and the CFO was fired. A second “new” CFO arrived and agreed to transfer EVM to the head of programs. The head of programs was instrumental in changing the disclosure statement making EVM personnel assigned to a program a direct charge to that program / contract. The head of programs created a Program Planning and Control (PP&C) organization and demanded all PMs and their program members to quickly learn, use and master EVM. A program control room was built with five screens. Daily 2:00 pm EVM data-driven reviews were held on short notice. These daily reviews became known as “CAM Bakes.” The EVM and program management culture changed quickly and dramatically at Company “A.”

Company “B” had EVM assigned to the CFO who was as “coin-operated” and unaware of EVM as the first “new” CFO of Company “A.” The culture of company “B” was very hostile to EVM, so it probably did not matter who “owned” EVM. The company failed 16 of 32 guidelines and was decertified. Significant withholdings were imposed and the company’s reputation was damaged. Several top managers hostile to EVM “sought employment elsewhere.” A new CFO arrived who was also “coin-operated” but expert in EVM. The new CFO formed a partnership with the head of programs. The new CFO was as much a PM as he was a CFO. The new CFO told his direct reports assigned to each program to “make the program managers successful.” And they did exactly that.

The new CFO understood that the company was the sum of all its contracts and that every dollar flowed from its customers. The EVM and program management culture at Company “B” changed rapidly.

Who Should “Own” EVM? Programs or Finance?

Returning to our original question of who should “own” EVM, the majority theory is that the Programs’ organization should “own” EVM. All else equal, I tend to agree with this theory.

However, while theory is suggestive, experience is conclusive. My experience at Company “A” proved that a strong programs’ leader could change the EVM and program management culture of a company rapidly. My experience at Company “B” proved that a CFO could “own” EVM and be successful at changing the company’s EVM and program management culture. The CFO and the head of programs must form an EVM partnership no matter who “owns” EVM.

Who “owns” EVM at your company?

Robert “Too Tall” Kenney
H&A Associate

Who Owns EVM? Programs or Finance? Read Post »

EVM for Biotech and Pharma – Part I Implementation and Training

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Updated December 13, 2017

 

EVM for Biotech and PharmaAs you know, the Earned Value Management System (EVMS) is a management process with characteristics that are absolutely logical to manage projects whether there is an external customer or not. The EVMS is also required by the Federal Government on DOD, DOE, FAA, NSA, DOT, DOJ, NASA, etc. contracts over $20M.

With the phasing in of the Affordable Health Care Act and recent funding for research and preparation in the event of bio-terrorism, other branches of the Government, such as Health and Human Services (HHS) and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), are becoming more involved in the healthcare sector. Implementing and using EVMS is a baseline requirement for biotech and pharmaceutical firms awarded large contracts by the Federal Government.

This will require companies and universities that receive funding to understand and implement Earned Value Management and that key project personnel, including management and executives, will require high quality Earned Value Training.

Why EVM and Government Contracts

Earned Value Management has been used since the 1960’s and has become the standard by which the Government measures and evaluates the management and reporting processes on projects awarded to contractors. Initially, it was implemented on projects; such as the development of satellites, long-range missiles, fighter aircraft, etc., but has become the US Government’s gold standard to manage the technical, schedule and cost progress of projects and to identify and manage risk and opportunities.

In order for defense contractors to be eligible for large contracts, they are required to follow the 32 Guidelines of the EIA-748-C which can entail system design and development and a substantial learning curve. Earned Value Management company-wide training and proper implementation becomes critical for project efficiency, future funding and to meet Government requirements.

Integral to EVM are the uses of the Integrated Master Plan (IMP)/Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and risk and opportunity management.  The Integrated Master Schedule is the basis for developing the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) which in turn, is the basis for measuring performance on a project.   Measurement of progress against the baseline provides early identification of problems and helps to identify and mitigate costs and risks, while also identifying opportunities, by implementation of appropriate corrective actions.

Earned Value Management Systems for Project Management

The basic concept of the Earned Value Management System is more than a unique project management technique.  The EIA-748-C contains 32 Guidelines that define a set of requirements that a contractor’s management system must meet. The objectives of an EVMS are:

  •  Relate time phased budgets to specific contract tasks and/or statements of work
  • Relate technical, schedule and cost performance information
  • Furnish valid, timely and auditable data/information for proactive management action and decision making
  • Provide the basis to capture work progress assessments against the baseline plan to facilitate realistic project costs and completion dates
  • Supply managers with a practical level of summarization for effective decision making

Once a contractor’s EVM System is designed and implemented, there are significant benefits to the contractor and to the customer:

  • Contractor benefits include increased visibility and control to quickly and proactively respond to issues which makes it easier to meet project technical, schedule, and cost objectives
  • Customer benefits include confidence in the contractor’s ability to manage the project, early problem identification, and objective rather than subjective contract cost and schedule status

Earned Value Management Training

Experienced project managers will tell you that understanding the scope, schedule and costs of a project is essential to its success. The primary objective of the EVMS is to ensure that all elements of a project are planned, authorized, managed, and controlled in a consistent and cost-effective manner.  There is an increasing demand for training for organizations beyond the traditional aerospace and defense related construction, software, research and development, and production environment to now include non-defense companies to implement and use the Earned Value Management System.

EVM for Biotech and Pharma

Biotech and Pharma companies are not strangers to dealing with government regulations and requirements. Most have gone through rigorous Food and Drug Administration (FDA) processes to receive approval of compounds and/or devices. Nonetheless, learning how to design and use an EVM system can take a considerable investment of time and money, but is an essential requirement for initial and ongoing funding.

In addition to the EIA-748-C, there are numerous documents that give direction regarding the implementation and use of an EVM system.  Some of these are the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Integrated Program Management Division (IPMD) EIA-748 Intent Guide, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Data Item Descriptions (DID), Military Standards (MIL-STD) such as MIL-STD-881, the Earned Value Management System Interpretation Guide (EVMSIG), and many others.  We have helped many organizations to ensure that they do not overkill or underkill based on their desired management system characteristics.  H&A personnel understand the requirements and are able to “size” those requirements to meet company and customer requirements.

Although Biotech and Pharma are relatively recent industries to use EVM, Humphreys & Associates (H&A) has been providing Earned Value Management training and implementation services for over 35 years. H&A provides self-paced online, classroom and private training courses, and can assist in all aspects of Earned Value Management Implementation.

For more information about EVM training or support, or with questions about your company’s requirements, please contact the Humphreys & Associates corporate office.

EVM for Biotech and Pharma – Part I Implementation and Training Read Post »

NDIA and Earned Value Management – Humphreys & Associates Marks 35+ Years of Participation

, , , , ,

NDIA and Earned Value ManagementThe National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), Integrated Program Management Division (IPMD) plays a central role in defining earned value management within the defense contracting community. Earned value management, or EVM, is a project management methodology that measures the technical, cost and scheduling performance of projects and/or programs. EVM systems (EVMS) are widely used and in some cases required by federal government agencies on large and complex contracts. The NDIA IPMD is industry’s opportunity to work closely with the federal government to set policy and provide guidance to its members.

NDIA and Eared Value Management Standards – Their Leadership Role

The NDIA has long taken the lead in setting EVM standards. In the 1990s, it recommended modifications to the 35 Department of Defense Cost Schedule Control Systems Criteria (C/SCSC) and proposed 32 guidelines that included the needs of industry as well as meeting the government requirements. The Defense Contracting Management Agency (DCMA) concurred with the use of the 32 guidelines which became the 748A standard. The NDIA IPMD has since maintained the role of managing the standard.

The NDIA Integrated Program Management Division (IPMD) also provides guidance in the implementation and use of EVM systems (EVMS) to achieve integrated program management. While IPMD membership is limited to industry representatives, government personnel from the various agencies implementing EVMS are regular participants in the IPMD’s quarterly working group meetings. The various IPMD working groups focus on strengthening the understanding and implementation of compliant EVM systems.

NDIA EVM System Guides

The IPMD has published a series of widely used EVMS guides. The Earned Value Management Systems Intent Guide provides an interpretation of the EIA 32 guidelines for  companies seeking to implement a compliant EVM system. The committee revised the Earned Value Management System Intent Guide in 2014 and continues working on further improvements. The Planning and Scheduling Excellence Guide (PASEG) Version 3 was released in 2016 and is used in the development of Integrated Master Plans (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedules (IMS) EVMS compliant processes and artifacts.    Other IPMD documents address specific aspects of the EVM process, such as the Earned Value Management System Acceptance Guide, the Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Guide and the Surveillance Guide. Other recent additions include a Guide to Managing Programs Using Predictive Measures and an Industry Practice Guide for Agile on EVM Programs.

At set contract value thresholds, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and Defense Acquisition Regulations (DFAR) requires the government program offices to ensure their supplier’s program management system meets the intent of the Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) of the EIA 748 standard. In some cases these systems must be validated by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) as being compliant with the EIA standard.  The NDIA continues to work with government and industry to drive the evolution of standards for Earned Value Management Systems implementation and acceptance in the United States and internationally.

Humphreys & Associates has been an active participant in the NDIA IPMD for more than 35 years. Three of our consultants, including the founder of the company, were part of the eight person committee that developed the EIA 748 Standard for EVMS. We also have three past chairs of the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Integrated Program Management Systems Committee (IPMD) on our staff. Our consultants continue to be active participates in the working groups responsible for the system guides and the continuing improvement of the EVMS guidelines.

Humphreys & Associates is the industry leader in Earned Value Management Systems design, implementation and EVMS training.  You can learn more on the Humphreys & Associates website.

NDIA and Earned Value Management – Humphreys & Associates Marks 35+ Years of Participation Read Post »

Scroll to Top